ich war hier: IntUrhREvidence

Revision history for IntUrhREvidence


Revision [31898]

Last edited on 2013-06-22 22:33:11 by AnnegretMordhorst
Additions:
----
CategoryInternatUrheberrecht


Revision [31620]

Edited on 2013-06-19 13:16:11 by Jorina Lossau
Additions:
**>>[[IntUrhRInfringement Zurück zum Hauptartikel]]>>**
Deletions:
**>>[[IntUrhRInfringement Zurück zum Hauptartikel]]>>**


Revision [31619]

Edited on 2013-06-19 13:15:58 by Jorina Lossau
Additions:
**>>[[IntUrhRInfringement Zurück zum Hauptartikel]]>>**
Deletions:
**>>[[IntUrhRInfringement Zurück zum Hauptartikel]]>>**


Revision [31618]

Edited on 2013-06-19 13:15:00 by Jorina Lossau
Additions:
||The US courts have developed some special rules of evidence for copyright infringements. Most notably is the distinction between direct evidence of the infringement and the circumstantial evidence. Direct evidence is often hard to prove; it is possible by mistakes transferred from the original to the copy. More often infringements can only be proved by circumstantial evidence. The courts normally prove whether (1) the presumed infringer had access to the work and (2) there is similarity between original and copy. This similarity has to be in substantial parts of the original.||


Revision [31617]

The oldest known version of this page was created on 2013-06-19 13:10:03 by Jorina Lossau
Valid XHTML :: Valid CSS: :: Powered by WikkaWiki